Friday, June 29, 2007
ELISA Pro?
I have spent the last two weeks fine-tuning my lab techniques and honing my ELISA skills. The first two human progesterone assays have been abandoned for the time being. We have been working with bovine serum and milk progesterone kits from the United Kingdom. This assay has worked very well, but the assay is not very sensitive and was designed for qualitative results. We are currently verifying parallelism {similarity between serially diluted samples and standard curves} within this assay with several samples from cows in late pregnancy. This looks promising after purchasing an alternate substrate that can be read by a absorbance filter in our possesion. We have also started working with estrone sulfate kits from Australia. This is a sweet little assay which appears very promising. It was specifically designed for pregnancy testing DHIA milk samples. I will be focusing on incresing the sensitivity of the estrone sulfate assay by looking at other assays (human) and possibly building our own estrone sulfate assay by purchasing indivdual components. The Australian kit is designed to confirm pregnancy at 120 days, but our goal is to lower that number.
Monday, June 18, 2007
The above graphs show a quick interpretation of the standard curves from two different human progesterone assays including the negative control bovine samples spiked with equivalent concentrations of progesterone. The Alpha Diagnostic assay appears promising, and we are currently waiting on testing of our negative control serum samples to validate low progesterone levels were present at the time those samples were taken. The Assay Designs kit is a more sensitive assay and has shown interference when bovine samples are used and an inability of the reagents to remain stable in the lab environment. (To view graphs in more detail click on image to increase size)
Friday, June 15, 2007
Introduction to ELISA Procedure
The goal of our lab work this week has been to determine which progesterone assays will work for bovine serum and milk. The two assays we have tried thus far were both designed for human serum. We first produced standard curves with progesterone samples provided in the kit or via serial dilution to determine if the assays were functioning properly. Bovine serum and milk samples were collected from cows enrolled in the G6G Ovsynch program at Nobis Dairy on days where natural progesterone levels were at their lowest concentration. These samples will provide our negative controls. The second day we repeated the standard dilutions and compared them to bovine serum and milk samples which had been spiked with equivalent concentrations of progesterone. This allowed us to look for components in milk or serum samples that may interfere with the reagents of the human progesterone assays. The assays were also run with undiluted, unaltered serum and defatted milk samples from the negative control samples. The assays which will be used for a marketable product need to perform well with unaltered samples of milk. Any extra processing required in an assay drives up production costs and will not allow us to offer a product at an affordable price to producers.
Therefore, I have begun my crash course in ELISAs. Running ELISA's consists of accurately pippetting minute quantities of reagents into small microtiter wells. This sounds fairly simple, especially when well-quipped with sophisticated equipment. I have learned that the degree of accuracy increases with the number of ELISAs the lab tech has run. This is very evident when I try to produce equivalent results when processing duplicate rows of samples compared to the lab techs that make everything look very easy when they dispense their billionth sample.
Therefore, I have begun my crash course in ELISAs. Running ELISA's consists of accurately pippetting minute quantities of reagents into small microtiter wells. This sounds fairly simple, especially when well-quipped with sophisticated equipment. I have learned that the degree of accuracy increases with the number of ELISAs the lab tech has run. This is very evident when I try to produce equivalent results when processing duplicate rows of samples compared to the lab techs that make everything look very easy when they dispense their billionth sample.
Thursday, June 14, 2007
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
Monday, June 11, 2007
Sample Collection
My first week of my internship consisted of familiarizing myself with my new place of employment and doing some background reading on the primary pregnancy hormones we will be focusing on. This includes progesterone, estrone sulfate (an estrogen metabolite) and some of the pregnancy related proteins. I have also realized the benefit of staying awake in immunology class as I am quickly becoming aware of my lack of working knowledge on ELISA tests. More on ELISA's later.
It was decided that our sample bank would be collected from Nobis Dairy Farms in St. John's, Michigan. After contacting the herd owners a schedule was arranged to collect serum and blood samples from the 700 lactating bovines. Blood and milk samples were collected during the same day from individual animals to provide a reference serum hormone level for each milk sample. Unfortunately, morning milkings at the Nobis farmstead begin at 2:30 AM. This resulted in some "zombie-like" behavior from myself, my supervisors (Todd Byrem and Bridgette Voisinet), and the willing (?) lab techs who were dragged along. Upon returning to the lab, samples were processed and stored in a freezer. Processing involves harvesting serum from the blood samples and freezing aliquots of both whole milk and defatted milk. Two types of milk samples were saved, allowing us to compare the effects of butterfat concentration on milk hormone levels. When samples were not being collected I prepared materials for collecting and processing samples. I have also started perusing the well-kept records of Nobis Dairy Farms to determine each cow's reproductive status.
It was decided that our sample bank would be collected from Nobis Dairy Farms in St. John's, Michigan. After contacting the herd owners a schedule was arranged to collect serum and blood samples from the 700 lactating bovines. Blood and milk samples were collected during the same day from individual animals to provide a reference serum hormone level for each milk sample. Unfortunately, morning milkings at the Nobis farmstead begin at 2:30 AM. This resulted in some "zombie-like" behavior from myself, my supervisors (Todd Byrem and Bridgette Voisinet), and the willing (?) lab techs who were dragged along. Upon returning to the lab, samples were processed and stored in a freezer. Processing involves harvesting serum from the blood samples and freezing aliquots of both whole milk and defatted milk. Two types of milk samples were saved, allowing us to compare the effects of butterfat concentration on milk hormone levels. When samples were not being collected I prepared materials for collecting and processing samples. I have also started perusing the well-kept records of Nobis Dairy Farms to determine each cow's reproductive status.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)